A had a rather special treat on my birthday - one theatre* in the whole state happened to still be playing Stardust, and it happened to also be the best theatre in the whole state. Since I first saw the trailer way back went I went to see Harry Potter, I knew I had to see this movie. When the words ‘I’m there’ pass my lips I’m never disappointed. Then all I knew about the movie was that it was beautiful, and it called to me. It took only minutes on wikipedia to discover the author was Neil Gaiman and my mind was set - I was seeing the movie.
The next trip I made to the library I wasted no time is finding the book. I’d own it, if the version I want didn’t cost nearly $40. The book was written in classic fairy tales style and has a distinct voice, and while it is slow to start it does not fail to charm and delight with the wit with which it is written, and the clever plot twist(which the movie serves up in the first ten minutes - my only gripe) which ties all the connecting stories together makes for a more then satisfying ending. Part of its brilliance, I think, it its simplicity and willingness to acknowledge its genre, while most fantasy books try to keep up their illusions. I’d recommend this book to anyone of any age, though it is most definitely an ‘adult’ story.
In the tranquil fields and meadows of long-ago England, there is a small hamlet that has stood on a jut of granite for 600 years. Just to the east stands a high stone wall, for which the village is named. Here, in the hamlet of Wall, young Tristran Thorn has lost his heart to the hauntingly beautiful Victoria Forester. And here, one crisp October eve, Tristran makes his love a promise — an impetuous vow that will send him through the only breach in the wall, across the pasture… and into the most exhilarating adventure of his life. - NeilGaiman.com
I actually applaud the movie for diverging from the book where it did. I book is not a movie and a movie should not try to be a visual book. They are different mediums and require different handling and storytelling. Not once during the movie did it feel like it was adapted from a book, a feel that is impossibly hard to capture from book-to-movie translations. Previously only Lord of the Rings came close, and even it had its problems. The visual effects are stunning(is it just me, or is Hollywood in love with breaking glass? I’ve been told there is Heavy Symbolism(tm) in that), and the acting was amazing - when an actor is having fun with his/her role, really enjoying it, it shows in the performance. I don’t think there was a person on the set who wasn’t enjoying their role.
To anyone who has yet to see the movie - I suggest reading the book first, then treating the movie as a retelling of the story and not an adaptation. Because that is what it is. Stardust was the first book of Neil Gaiman’s that I read, and he is now one of my favorite authors.
And yes, I did swoon when I heard he’d be writing pep talks for this year’s NaNoWriMo.
*I apologize for my usage of the British spelling. theater always looks like an unpolished, rough word to me. I picked up ‘theatre’ first and don’t really care if my spellchecker balks at it. perhaps I’ll do a eassy on this something and explain my self-imposed rules for grey vs. gray.